80%

DIFFERENCE

GROWN WITH AND WITHOUT CANNA AIR CARE


4 room cannabis production facility in LA

Room "A" Downstairs


Flowering roomSize: 40ft x 20ft x 12ft.Light cyclemidnight until midday:

Room "B" Downstairs


Flowering roomSize: 40ft x 20ft x 12ft.Light cyclenoon until midnight:

Room "A" Downstairs


Vegetivegrowth room Size: 40ft x 20ft x 8ft.

Room "B" Upstairs


Cloning room withmother plantsSize: 20ft x 16ft x 7ft.


Both A & B are same dimensions but have separate air systems.


Prove the effectiveness of Canna Air Care as a preventative in a commercial cannabis grow room facility.

Prove the stability in active spores between Room [A] down & Room [B] down.

Prove the instability of active mustiness in rooms without Canna Air Care.

Prove that when Canna Air Care is removed from a room, mustiness counts rapidly increase.

Prove that Canna Air Care will not and does not harm medicinal cannabis plants in any way.

Demonstrate that only using Canna Air Care preventative gel provides a greater result than alcohol based sprays.

Demonstrate that by using the Canna Air Care system there is a significant return on investment.


Although Room [A] Down was never sprayed and only used preventative gel, there were numerous challenges during the 57 days of trials. (7 day & 50 days)

Plants were grown in top soil which is decaying matter which constantly releases active spores 24/7.

Several tests were performed at the height of the plant pots (2ft) and not at the height of the flowers. (Canna Air Care was next to fans blowing onto the flowering section of plants (5ft).

Room [B] Down was sprayed with an alcohol solution about half an hour prior to testing on several occasions.

Tests revealed Room [A] Down had a severe A/C contamination issue that was only discovered well into the growth cycle, whereas Room [B] down had a clean A/C system.

Room [A] Down ran short of slow releasing gel during the trial due to mix up with courier. This left flowering plants vulnerable for several days.


www.ilab-us.com

iLab, we provide testing that is both innovative and analytical – or “innova-tical”. We only use state-of-the-art instruments and the latest testing methods from ground-breaking research.


Room [A] Down became the only room to contain Canna Air Care slow releasing gel.

Room [A] Down was not sprayed or treated with any other product.

Rooms [B] Down, [B] Up & [A] Up continued with standard practice, including alcohol based spraying several times per week.

Slow releasing gel was placed next to oscillating fans in various locations within Room [A] Down.

Tests were performed by taking air samples of 250 & 400 cubic litres of air.

Air samples were taken with a new $6K air sampling tester which is a professional laboratory device.

Each and every test was performed by a PhD from Innovatical Laboratories LLC (iLab).

Tests were performed at approximately the same time of day and taken from the same locations within all rooms.


Room [A] Down & Room [A] Up both contained Canna Air Care.

Room [B] Down & Room [B] Up both had NO Canna Air Care.

Tests over 7 days only due to end of flower cycle Room [A] Down.

Room [A] Down was also tested for potentially harmful bacteria.

All tests were performed at a height of 5-6 feet high.

Air samples were taken with a new $6K air sampling tester which is a professional laboratory device.

Every test was performed by a PhD from Innovatical Laboratories LLC (iLab).


Difference in Foliar leaf between [A] Down & [B] Down.

Measure content in consumable flowers between [A] Down & [B] Down.

Differences in yield between [A] Down & [B] Down.


RESULTS FLOWER ROOM [A] DOWNSTAIRS 7 DAY TRIAL WITH CANNA AIR CARE

7 Day Test
12 Oscillating Full Fans
6th Week Flower Cycle
Flowering Plants

Results


-54.7%

REDUCTION


-77.8%

REDUCTION

Lab Report


265

CFU 12th Oct

REDUCED TO

120

CFU 12th Oct


532

CFU 19th Oct

REDUCED TO

188

CFU 19th Oct



VEGETIVE ROOM [A] UPSTAIRS 7 DAY TRIAL WITH CANNA AIR CARE

7 Day Test
12 Oscillating Full Fans
2nd Week Vegetive Cycle
Plant Cuttings

Results


-42.4%

REDUCTION


Lab Report


205

CFU 12th Oct


118

CFU 19th Oct


FLOWER ROOM [B] DOWNSTAIRS 7 DAY TRIAL NO PRODUCT

7 Day Test
12 Oscillating Full Fans
3rd Week Cycle
Flowering Plants

Results


+140%

INCREASED


Lab Report


75

CFU 12th Oct


180

CFU 19th Oct


VEGETIVE ROOM [B] UPSTAIRS 7 DAY TRIAL NO PRODUCT

7 Day Test
12 Oscillating Full Fans
3rd Week Mother Plants & Clones
No Products

Results


+305.7%

INCREASED


Lab Report


55

CFU 12th Oct


223

CFU 19th Oct

Results Room "A" With Product


54%

REDUCTION

Reduced


265

CFU 12th Oct


120

CFU 12th Oct

194%

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO IDENTICAL ROOMS

-77.8%

REDUCTION

532

CFU 12th Oct


118

CFU 19th Oct

Results No Product


+140%

Increased

Increassed


75

CFU 12th Oct


180

CFU 19th Oct

194%

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO IDENTICAL ROOMS

+305%

INCREASED

55

CFU 12th Oct


223

CFU 19th Oct


FLOWER ROOM [A] DOWN WITH CANNA AIR CARE

59 Day Test
12 Oscillating Full Fans
240 Plants in Flowering Cycle
13 Canna Air Care Products

Results


1.5%

From Planting Until Harvest


DEMONSTRATED STABILITY OVER GROWTH CYCLE

Lab Report


130

CFU 31st Oct


132

CFU 29th Dec


FLOWER ROOM [B] DOWN NO PRODUCT

7 Day Test
12 Oscillating Full Fans
240 Plants in Flower Cycle
No Products

Results


+168%

Spiked To 695 CFU. Harvest 8th Dec


Lab Report


148

CFU 12th Oct


385

CFU 5th Dec


VEG ROOM [A] UPSTAIRS NO PRODUCT

7 Day Test
12 Oscillating Full Fans
+300  Clone Veg Cycle
No Products

Results


+138%

INCREASED


Lab Report


198

CFU 31th Oct


472

CFU 19th Dec


MOTHER PLANTS ROOM [B] UP NO PRODUCT

7 Day Test
12 Oscillating Full Fans
Full Growth Cycle
No Products

Results


+64%

INCREASED


Lab Report


303

CFU 31st Oct


498

CFU 19th Dec


[A] Down maintained a miniscule 130 CFU from beginning of growth cycle until harvest.[B] Down showed several spikes up to 369% increase 148 to 695 CFU[B] Up showed several spikes up to 106% increase 303 CFU to 563.[A] Down showed several spikes up to 138% increase 318 CFU to 472 CFU


FLOWER ROOM TESTS [A] & [B]

Room [A] Down


STABLILITY


1.5%

STABLILITY WITH PREVENTATIVE GEL ONLY

Identical flower rooms


WITH PREVENTATIVE GEL ONLY


59 DAY FLOWER CYCLE

Room [B] Down


INCREASED


+168%

INCREASED

Identical flower rooms


ALCOHOL SPRAYED 3X PER WEEK


35 DAY FLOWER CYCLE

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO IDENTICAL ROOMS

+166.5%


ROOM A DOWN WITH CANNA AIR CAREOne leaf from each room picked at random and tested for surface . 53.9% difference between Room A-D & Room B-D.No Canna Air Care Room B Down 115 spores per inch With Canna Air Care Room A Down 53 spores per inch

Differentiation 2 Rooms


-53.9%

REDUCTION OF SPORES


DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 2 ROOMS

Complete Flower Cycle


115

ROOM A. SPORES PER GRAM


53

ROOM B. SPORES PER GRAM


Several grams of consumable flower were taken from both Room [A] Down and Room [B] Down and tested in the lab.CFU Per Gram of Flower 80% differentiation between the 2 rooms.

DIFFERENTIATION 2 ROOMS


-80%

Demonstrates Reduction Room A;


DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 2 ROOMS

Decreased


220

Spores Per Gram


1100

Spores Per Gram


Room [B] Down without Canna Air Care = 21.2 lbsRoom [A] Down WITH Canna Air Care = 28.4 lbs

INCREASED YIELD


+33.9%

MAINLY DUE TO CANNA AIR CARE


Yield


21.2lbs

Without Product


28.4lbs

With Canna Air Care


7.2lbs

Difference